NO RECOVERY, NO FEE (855) 339-8879 FREE CONSULTATION

Chevy Cobalt Air Bag Failure Lawsuit – GM Ignition Switch Class Action


Chevy Cobalt Air Bag Failure Lawsuit – GM Ignition Switch Class ActionAuto manufacturing giant General Motors has issued millions of recalls over the past year due to a defect in their vehicle ignition switch systems. One of the chief concerns regarding these vehicles is a heightened risk of their Airbags failing to deploy upon an inspection due to e shutting down of the vehicles electronic systems caused by the ignition switch defect. So far hundreds of individuals have filed complaints against the General Motors for injuries sustained due to airbag and ignition switch failures of several General Motors vehicles. According to investigators and General Motors more claims of injury and death with airbags failing to deploy in Chevy Cobalt’s are more than five to fifty times greater than any other vehicle in its class. Victim Right to Compensation: Individual who have suffered harm due an airbag failure in a Chevy Cobalt may have the right to compensation for all harms suffered.

Specific Make and Models of Vehicles Containing the Ignition Switch Airbag Defect

Note: Most of the vehicles known to be defective were manufactured between 2002 and 2007.
  • Chevrolet Cobalt
  • Pontiac G5
  • Saturn Ion
  • Saturn Sky
  • Chevrolet HHR
  • Pontiac Solstice

Compensation Available for Victims of Chevy Cobalt Air bag Failure Injuries

Victims of severe injuries due to accidents caused by defective vehicles are entitled to compensation for all harms suffered. Specific categories of damages compensable in personal injury / defective product cases include the following..
  • All health care costs associated with the injuries you have suffered – including hospitalization, treatment for injuries, MRI’s, as well as future medical and rehabilitation expenses.
  • All economic damages sustained – damage to property, lost wages, loss of work due to injuries and future loss of income or reduction in earning capacity due to sustainment of long term injuries and disabilities.
  • Non-economic damages – mental trauma, emotional anguish, pain and suffering.

Punitive Damage Compensation – GM Recall Lawsuits

Punitive damages are designed to punish at fault parties who have acted with either the intent to cause harm or willful-wanton disregard for the life and health of individual  consumers. In the case of the Chevy Cobalt, recent reports have indicated that General Motors knew that the ignition switch defect resulted in a significant increase in both the rate of accidents and the rate of airbag failures in their vehicles but failed to take measures required to correct the issue and recall its products.

Filing a Wrongful Death Lawsuit:

The death of a loved one is a tragedy for close relatives. Historically, under the Common Law system, individuals were barred from filing a personal injury tort claim against at fault parties for the death of their loved ones. However almost all states across the country have enacted wrongful death statutes which permit certain family members the right to seek compensation form at fault parties for the death of their loved ones. Legal Consultation Available: All legal case reviews regarding claims against General Motors for malfunctioning airbags and ignition switches are free of charge. If you have any further legal questions feel free to contact our law offices toll free (855)385-2529. Further Information: GM Failure to Timely Recall Cobalts Wrongful Death Lawsuits Against GM

Over $350 Million Recovered
for Our Clients

Learn More

YOU Deserve the Best
Free Case Review 24/7
You Don’t Pay unless we win
Call 855.385.2529


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive telephone calls and text messages at anytime, which include hours outside of business hours (8:00 am PST – 9:00 pm PST). This is so that we may reach you as soon as possible in order to consult on your potential case.

ultimate guide uber lyft accidents

Featured Lawyers


farid-medium

Farid Yaghoubtil, Esq.

sal-medium

Salar Hendizadeh, Esq.

Nina Sargsyan, Esq.

Sarah Wilson, Esq.

Sarah Wilson, Esq.

Darren McBratney, Esq.

dan-medium

Daniel Azizi, Esq.

 

 

Free Case Review 24/7
You Don't Pay Unless You Win
Call 855.385.2529


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By submitting this form, you agree to receive telephone calls and text messages at anytime, which include hours outside of business hours (8:00 am PST - 9:00 pm PST). This is so that we may reach you as soon as possible in order to consult on your potential case.

Address:

LOS ANGELES OFFICE
4113 Clinton Ave,
Los Angeles, CA 90004
855-339-8879
info@downtownlalaw.com

BAKERSFIELD OFFICE
2005, Eye Street, Suite 4
Bakersfield, CA 93301
661-219-7455

MODESTO OFFICE
3430 Tully Road
Modesto, California 95350
209-353-4493

ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
2372 Morse Ave.
Irvine, California 92614
949-627-8725

SAN DIEGO OFFICE
01 West Broadway
San Diego, California 92101
619-413-0161

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
1 Sansome St. Suite 3500-11
San Francisco, California 94104
650-651-5006

VENTURA OFFICE
701 E Santa Clara St
Ventura, California 95816
805-292-0367

INLAND EMPIRE OFFICE
7121 Magnolia Ave
Riverside, California 92504
909-340-3929

VICTORVILLE OFFICE
13782 Bear Valley Rd.
Victorville, California 92392
760-563-4384

FRESNO OFFICE
5588 N Palm Ave
Fresno, California 93704
559-556-0227

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
388 Market St #1300
San Francisco, California 94111
415-362-6079

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
1601 Alhambra Blvd
Sacramento, California 95816
916-931-1965

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
1 Sansome St. Suite 3500-11
San Francisco, California 94104
650-651-5006

MIAMI OFFICE
11900 Biscayne Blvd North
Miami, Florida 33154

EL PASO OFFICE
4600 Alabama St #C
El Paso, Texas 79930
(915) 201-3865


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
Follow us
© All Rights Reserved