NO RECOVERY, NO FEE
(855) 339-8879
FREE CONSULTATION

Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act is Outdated and Unfair – Vote YES


In 1975, the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act was passed – limiting the amount of non-economic damages that victims of medical malpractice claims could recover to $250,000. Non-economic damages generally include compensation awarded for the following, for example: pain and suffering; loss of enjoyment of life; loss of consortium; emotional harm. In most instances, non-economic damages make up a significant portion of the compensation available for victims of medical malpractice claims. This cap of $250,000 prevents victims and their families from recovering the compensation that they deserve. This cap is clearly unfair to the victims of medical malpractice – so why did it pass in the first place? The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act was passed as a response to the alleged medical malpractice insurance crisis in which premiums were skyrocketing due to the damage awards for medical malpractice claims. In essence, the law resulted in insurance companies saving millions of dollars on insurance claims at the expense of victims of medical malpractice who were rightfully entitled to more compensation that they received. The medical malpractice that has affected children, parents, and the elderly alike resulting in permanent injuries and even death in some cases continues to be undervalued due the outdated and unfair Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act. Victims of medical malpractice who have lost limbs and suffered paralyzing injuries are unjustly only recovering an insignificant portion of the non-economic compensation to which they are entitled – which is reduced even further due to expensive legal fees. This also applies to the surviving family members of victims who lost their lives due to medical negligence. Do you think you deserve more than $250,000 if you or a member of your family was subjected to medical malpractice? The loss of life and the loss of ability to live a normal life is worth significantly more than $250,000 – but California’s current legislation does not allow the parties affected by medical malpractice to be rightfully compensated. This cap on non-economic damages is unconstitutional because it does not allow jurors to award victims the amount that they think they deserve. Jurors dedicate significant time and effort during trials. They spend countless hours listening to claims, evaluating evidence, and deliberating their decision to ensure that victims are rightfully compensated. However, jurors are often unaware that all their hard work goes down the drain when the cap is applied and the non-economic compensation portion of the award is reduced to $250,000 regardless of the specific circumstances of the claim. The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act is a violation of Civil Rights as well as Constitutional Rights to a jury trial that determines the compensation that claimants are eligible to receive. The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act lies to Californian jurors. The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act prevents claims from being efficiently valued on a case-to-case basis. Other states do not have such caps on the non-economic damages available – and they are allowing jurors to rightfully compensate the victims affected by medical malpractice. At Downtown L.A. Law Group, we support victims. We support injured victims and surviving family members. We have a thorough understanding of all the difficulties that are likely to arise due to being affected with medical malpractice. We do not believe it is fair for victims of medical negligence to be capped at $250,000 for non-economic damages. It is not fair for victims of medical malpractice to be subjected to these unconstitutional damage caps. At Downtown L.A. Law Group, we support all parties who have been permanently affected by medical malpractice. Vote YES on the ballot measure to finally put an end to this injustice.

Over $350 Million Recovered
for Our Clients

Learn More

YOU Deserve the Best
Free Case Review 24/7
You Don’t Pay unless we win
Call 855.385.2529


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive telephone calls and text messages at anytime, which include hours outside of business hours (8:00 am PST – 9:00 pm PST). This is so that we may reach you as soon as possible in order to consult on your potential case.

ultimate guide uber lyft accidents

I had a previous attorney who failed me miserably. I reached to this Law group and it was the best decision I made. Very caring and understanding staff. Recommend this to law group to everyone.”

⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆

Lesley Portillo

Free Case Review 24/7
You Don’t Pay Unless You Win
Call 855.385.2529


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By submitting this form, you agree to receive telephone calls and text messages at anytime, which include hours outside of business hours (8:00 am PST – 9:00 pm PST). This is so that we may reach you as soon as possible in order to consult on your potential case.

Address:

4113 Clinton Ave,
Los Angeles, CA 90004
855-339-8879
info@downtownlalaw.com

BAKERSFIELD OFFICE
2005, Eye Street, Suite 4
Bakersfield, CA 93301
661-219-7455

MODESTO OFFICE
3430 Tully Road
Modesto, California 95350
209-353-4493

ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
2372 Morse Ave.
Irvine, California 92614
949-627-8725

SAN DIEGO OFFICE
01 West Broadway
San Diego, California 92101
619-413-0161

VENTURA OFFICE
701 E Santa Clara St
Ventura, California 95816
805-292-0367

INLAND EMPIRE OFFICE
7121 Magnolia Ave
Riverside, California 92504
909-340-3929

VICTORVILLE OFFICE
13782 Bear Valley Rd.
Victorville, California 92392
760-563-4384

FRESNO OFFICE
5588 N Palm Ave
Fresno, California 93704
559-556-0227

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
388 Market St #1300
San Francisco, California 94111
415-362-6079

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
1601 Alhambra Blvd
Sacramento, California 95816
916-931-1965

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
1 Sansome St. Suite 3500-11
San Francisco, California 94104
650-651-5006


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
© All Rights Reserved
Follow us