California Supreme Court Ruling Means One Instance of Workplace Harassment is Serious Enough
A Supreme Court ruling held that even one single, severe incident can be racial harassment under FEHA, which overrides previous lower court decisions. This decision highlights the need for employers to take absolutely all complaints and reports of harassment seriously.
About the Case – Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney’s Office, No. S265223
The case involves Twanda Bailey, an investigator at the San Francisco DA’s Office. Bailey experienced a highly offensive racial slur from a worker. Bailey reported the incident, and the coworker faced discipline. However, Bailey claimed that the incident, along with other conditions at the workplace, created a hostile work environment. Bailey claimed that this one-time incident was severe enough to be considered racial harassment under FEHA. Bailey’s initial claims were dismissed by the trial court and by the appellate court; the trial court ruled that the single incident did not meet the standards for a hostile work environment, and the appellate court upheld the ruling.
The California Supreme Court reversed the trial and appellate court’s rulings – and provided important clarification surrounding the standards used to determine hostile work environments under FEHA. Further, the ruling highlighted that both severity and pervasiveness (or the frequency) are critical in evaluating these claims. That is, while isolated or one-time incidents generally may not meet the threshold, severe incidents (even if just one incident) may suffice. This aligns with standards established by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
To summarize, the court stressed the following key points:
- The harassment must be both objectively and subjectively offensive
- The behavior must be viewed as either hostile or abusive by a reasonable person and by the victim.
- One single, severe incident could create a hostile work environment (no pattern of behavior necessary).
$2.2 Million
$2,287,495
$54 Million
$22 Million
$2.5 Million
$2,100,000
$1,900,000
$1,275,000
Whenever a lower court ruling is reversed by a Supreme Court ruling, it is important to understand how future cases can be affected. Consider the following effects resulting from the Bailey case:
- The result of the case sets legal precedent. Specifically, it broadens the definition of what constitutes a hostile work environment. Further, it clarifies that even one severe incident can suffice, which shifts the previous requirement of a pattern of behavior to constitute a hostile work environment.
- The result of the case reinforces and extends employee protections under FEHA, as now even isolated yet severe incidents of harassment can be grounds for legal claims.
- The result of the case highlights the need for employers to take absolutely all complaints of harassment seriously, even if complaints stem from a single incident.
The results of this case means that California employers must take steps to align with the recently clarified standards. This means that they may need to update their harassment policies, conduct regular training for employees, properly respond to complaints of harassment (i.e., investigating reports and taking disciplinary action), properly documenting all reports of harassment, maintaining communication with the complainant throughout the investigation process, and establish support systems (like counseling) for employees who report harassment.
What Does this Mean for Employees?Since a pattern of behavior was needed to meet the threshold for a hostile work environment, some employees did not take any action after experiencing a single incident of harassment, even if it was severe. Now, based on the clarified standards, employees who experience even just one incident of harassment could have grounds to pursue a claim – given that the one incident is severe.
Yes, you could have grounds to pursue a claim. Prior to the Bailey case, some employees may not have had grounds to pursue a claim. However, the Bailey case has clarified standards and has set legal precedent – essentially laying the groundwork for employees who have experienced one-time but severe instances of harassment. If you are ready to explore the legal options available to you, please do not hesitate to reach out to our law firm as soon as possible.
Contact the Downtown L.A. Law Group TodayOur firm believes in fighting to get our clients justice. If you experienced racial harassment or any other form of harassment at your workplace, please do not hesitate to reach out to our legal team as soon as possible. Our team has decades of experience and is ready to provide you with the guidance that you need to fight for your rights as an employee. We offer free case evaluations, which include free consultations and free second opinions. During these free legal services, our team will be available to answer all your questions and address all your concerns; our workplace discrimination lawyers will be available to provide you with all the information that you need and guide you every step of the way. Contact our team today to schedule a free case review.
Our firm offers a Zero-Fee Guarantee, meaning that our team will not pay any upfront legal costs for any of our legal services. In addition, our team works on a strict contingency structure, meaning that you will not be required to pay absolutely anything if your claim is not successful. If you do not win, you simply will not be required to pay.
Contact us today to learn more about your right to sue for workplace harassment.
Other Pages on Our Website Related to This Topic
Can I Get Workers’ Comp for a Slip and Fall at a Company Party?
Party Injury Attorney
If I Get Injured at a Company Holiday Party, Can I File for Workers’ Compensation
Over $1 BILLION Recovered
for Our Clients
YOU Deserve the Best
Free Case Review 24/7
You Don’t Pay unless we win
Call (855) 339-8879
"*" indicates required fields
