{"id":7767,"date":"2012-09-08T16:17:26","date_gmt":"2012-09-08T23:17:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/downtownlalaw.com\/?p=7767"},"modified":"2026-06-16T19:42:10","modified_gmt":"2026-06-16T19:42:10","slug":"christopher-darde-bloody-glove-in-trial-tampered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/downtownlalaw.com\/es\/defective-product\/christopher-darde-bloody-glove-in-trial-tampered\/","title":{"rendered":"El fiscal de O.J. Simpson dice que el guante ensangrentado del juicio fue manipulado por Johnnie Cochran"},"content":{"rendered":"

O.J. Simpson Prosecutor Says that Bloody Glove in Trial Tampered with by Johnnie Cochran<\/h1>\n
\n
\"O.J.A key piece of evidence that led to the acquittal of the 1995 O.J. Simpson murder trial is now under fire after a key prosecutor questions its authenticity. On Thursday, Christopher Darden, a member of the prosecution team announced his belief during a panel trial at Pace Law School that Johnnie Cochran, one of Mr. Simpson’s attorneys, tampered with now famous “bloody glove.” Darden stated that “Johnnie [Cochran] tore the lining. There were some additional tears in the lining so that O.J’s fingers couldn’t go all the way up into the glove.”\nAfter Simpson attempted to put on the glove, Cochran immediately exclaimed “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit,” in one of the more noteworthy points of the trial. Darden continued by stating that the bailiff had mentioned to him that the defense was in possession of the glove during the lunch hour, and he had been suspicious for quite a while that defense counsel had manipulated the glove.\nAlan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor and a member of O.J. Simpson’s defense team downplayed Darden’s accusations. He called Darden’s comments “a total fabrication,” and in fact went after Darden personally by saying, “Having made one of the biggest blunders of the 20th Century, he’s trying to blame it on the dead man.” The fact that Mr. Darden\u2019s accusations come over 17 years later certainly raises some eyebrows. O.J. Simpson was eventually found liable in the civil case, which required him to provide the family with damages totaling a very large amount.\nO.J. Simpson was eventually found liable in the civil trial, which ordered him to compensate the family’s damages to the amount<\/a> of .5 million. Five years ago, in 2007 Mr. Simpson was charged in a separate charge for armed robbery. Simpson stated that he was only trying to recover his stolen memorabilia. He is currently in jail serving his 33 year sentence.<\/div>\n
\n\n <\/a>\n<\/div>\n
\n\t\t

Free Case Review 24\/7
\n\t\t WE FIGHT FOR YOU<\/span>
\n\t\t\tCall 855.385.2529<\/a>\n\n\t\t<\/h3>\n\t\t
\n\t\t